top of page

Handling Disagreements with Physicians or Surgeons Regarding Pre-Anesthesia Assessments


In the complex world of medical practice, disagreements are inevitable. Such is often the case between anesthesia providers and physicians or surgeons regarding pre-anesthesia assessments or deciding to cancel a procedure. Effectively handling these disagreements is essential not only for maintaining professional relationships but, more importantly, for ensuring patient safety. Here's a guide to addressing these situations:





physician and anesthesia disagreements

1. Patient Safety First: (disagreements with physicians and surgeons)

Regardless of any disagreement, the paramount concern should always be patient safety. Both the anesthesia provider and the surgeon share a common goal – to provide the best care possible for their patient. When a disagreement arises, it's essential to refocus on this shared objective and consider the reasons behind each viewpoint.

2. Effective Communication:

  • Listen Actively: Before jumping to conclusions, listen to the other party's viewpoint. Understand their concerns and the basis for their decisions.

  • Express Clearly: Be concise and direct when expressing your concerns. Back up your viewpoint with evidence from medical literature, clinical guidelines, or past experience.

  • Avoid Confrontation: While standing up for your professional opinion is essential, do so without becoming confrontational. Confrontation can lead to defensive behaviors, making resolution harder.

3. Seek Mediation:

Consider seeking mediation if the disagreement cannot be resolved through direct communication. This could be from a senior colleague, department head, or another neutral party. They can provide a fresh perspective and might offer solutions that haven't been considered when dealing with physician and surgeon disagreements.

4. Documentation:

Always document your assessments, concerns, and the reasons behind any decisions made, including those to cancel a case. This provides a reference in case of future disagreements and protects both parties from potential legal or administrative issues.

5. Continuous Education:

Sometimes disagreements arise from differences in understanding or knowledge about new techniques, guidelines, or research findings. By ensuring that both parties engage in continuous education, it helps align perspectives and reduces the chance of misunderstandings.




6. Establish Clear Guidelines:

Many hospitals and surgical centers have clear guidelines regarding pre-anesthesia assessments and indications for case cancellations. If your institution doesn't have them or if they're outdated, consider working together to establish or revise them. This provides a neutral framework to refer to during disagreements.

7. Reflect and Learn:

After resolving the disagreement, reflect on the situation. What could have been done differently? What can be learned? This reflective practice not only helps personal growth but can also lead to improved collaboration in the future.

In Conclusion:

The dynamic between anesthesia providers and surgeons is crucial for the efficient functioning of any surgical team. Disagreements are a natural part of any collaborative process, but they can be managed effectively with clear communication, understanding, and a focus on the common goal of patient safety. Remember, the ultimate aim is to provide optimal care, and sometimes, it takes a little negotiation and compromise to get there.




bottom of page