top of page

Most recent salary survey findings for a California Congregate Living Facility

40 minutes ago
4 min read

Staff is your biggest investment.
Staff is your biggest investment.

At the request of a new client, we pulled the most recent salary ranges for positions that serve the needs of the congregate patients. Below was our findings:


Assuming you mean a California Congregate Living Health Facility (CLHF) and LVN these are practical starting budget ranges as of October 2026.

These are estimated amounts the facility pays employees or contracted professionals, not insurance reimbursement rates. County, patient acuity, ventilator care, experience and coverage requirements will affect pricing.

Employee compensation

Position

Estimated base pay range

Suggested starting budget

Administrator — full time, one small facility

$80,000–$120,000/year

$100,000/year

Director of Nursing — RN, full time

$110,000–$150,000/year

$130,000/year

RN staff

$45–$65/hour

$55/hour

LVN staff

$28–$38/hour

$33/hour

CNA staff

$20–$27/hour

$24/hour

These are planning ranges, not measured CLHF salary bands. For comparison, published congregate-care listings show LVN rates around $25–$35/hour, while Indeed reports approximately $136,346 annually for a DON at Burbank Congregate Living Center. The administrator estimate has less direct CLHF-specific public evidence. LVN example, DON salary reference


For an initial operating budget, allow another 20%–30% above base wages for employer taxes, workers’ compensation, benefits and paid leave. That is a budgeting allowance; overtime, shift differentials and replacement coverage should be calculated separately.


Contracted services per patient visit

The following are estimated direct-contract negotiation ranges for a scheduled visit with routine documentation. Specify visit duration, travel, care coordination and cancellation terms in the agreement.

Professional

Routine follow-up visit

Initial assessment or evaluation

Suggested routine-visit budget

Social services — BSW

$65–$95

$95–$140

$80

Registered Dietitian — RD/RDN

$85–$125

$125–$200

$105

Physical Therapist — PT

$90–$120

$125–$175

$105

Speech Therapist — ST/SLP

$110–$150

$150–$200

$130

Occupational Therapist — OT

$90–$120

$125–$175

$105

Public comparisons include $90–$145 per OT visit, $120–$200 per skilled speech visit, and $130–$145 for PT home-health start-of-care visits. These are related home-health benchmarks, not a published CLHF fee schedule. OT employer posting, speech employer posting, PT employer posting


The BSW estimate uses related hospice contracting as a comparison; one California posting advertises $70–$100 per visit and accepts qualifying BSW applicants. RD private-practice examples include $145 initial assessments and $115 follow-ups. Confirm the professional qualifications required for the actual service. Social-work comparison, RD comparison


Respiratory Therapist — RT

Arrangement

Estimated budget range

Direct employee

$40–$60/hour

Contracted hourly coverage

$60–$90/hour

Scheduled routine patient visit

$85–$140/visit

Initial complex respiratory or ventilator assessment

$125–$200/visit

The contract and visit figures are planning estimates. California’s published respiratory-therapist wage data show a $50.40 hourly median across settings. For continuous ventilator coverage, budget actual coverage hours separately from periodic assessment visits. California RT wage data


RD menu reviews, facility inspections, staff training and committee attendance should also have a separate hourly fee or retainer.


California wage distinction: The state’s labor department says CLHFs are not covered by the special health-care-worker minimum-wage law. Applicable state and local wage requirements still apply. California DIR guidance



The Math:


Use this formula to estimate an employee’s total cost, including employer expenses:

Total employee cost = Hourly rate × Paid hours × (1 + Employer expense percentage)

Employer expenses include payroll taxes, workers’ compensation, benefits and paid leave. For a preliminary budget, you can use 25% until you have actual costs.

For an employee earning $30/hour, working 40 hours/week:

Period

Calculation

Estimated cost

Hourly

$30 × 1.25

$37.50

Weekly

$30 × 40 × 1.25

$1,500

Monthly average

$30 × 40 × 52 ÷ 12 × 1.25

$6,500

Annual

$30 × 40 × 52 × 1.25

$78,000

For a full-time employee working 40 hours weekly, the shortcut is:

Estimated annual cost = Hourly rate × 2,080 × 1.25

The 25% is a planning assumption. Add overtime, shift differentials and replacement coverage separately, and avoid counting paid leave twice.


Twelve Hour Shifts: Use R = hourly rate and B = employer expense percentage. With a 25% allowance, multiply wages by 1.25.

For California nonexempt staff, a standard 12-hour workday generally includes 8 regular hours plus 4 hours at time-and-a-half. A qualifying, validly adopted healthcare alternative workweek can permit scheduled 12-hour days at straight time. California overtime rules

Shift arrangement

Estimated total cost per shift

Example at $30/hour, including 25%

8 paid hours, straight time

R × 8 × 1.25

$300

12 paid hours, with daily overtime

[(R × 8) + (R × 1.5 × 4)] × 1.25

$525

12 paid hours, qualifying straight-time schedule

R × 12 × 1.25

$450

To calculate longer periods:

  • Weekly cost = Cost per shift × Shifts per week

  • Annual cost = Weekly cost × 52

  • Average monthly cost = Annual cost ÷ 12

For one continuously staffed position, 24 hours per day, at $30/hour:

Coverage schedule

Daily cost

Annual cost

Three 8-hour shifts

$300 × 3 = $900

$328,500

Two 12-hour shifts with daily overtime

$525 × 2 = $1,050

$383,250

Two qualifying straight-time 12-hour shifts

$450 × 2 = $900

$328,500

These examples assume all shift hours are paid, the overtime regular rate equals the stated hourly rate, and no additional weekly or seventh-day premiums apply. Meal relief, handoff overlap and replacement coverage are additional costs.


12 Hour shift nurses have more "me" time!
12 Hour shift nurses have more "me" time!

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page